This is an excellent analysis of the deficient objections against reformed apologetics and the answers to those objections
Internet gadfly, Jacob Brunton, believes presuppositional apologetics is maddening idiocy and any sound-minded believer who thinks presuppositionally and utilizes the methodology is a fool. He has taken to both Facebook and Twitter to rail against presuppers like myself.
Before we begin with a response to his missives, let’s remind ourselves of the main presup distinctives.
– Presuppositionalism desires to reform apologetic methodology. An apologetic approach that honors the sovereignty of God in salvation and the self-attesting nature of Scripture. It also focuses in upon the antithesis between believing and unbelieving thinking and philosophical worldviews. It then structures the Christian engagement with unbelievers according to a biblical framework. Classicists, like Jacob, will say they hold to the sovereignty of God in salvation, but they typically reject the self-attesting nature of Scripture and operate from the notion that proofs and evidence can be self-authenticating, as well as reasonably considered by unbelievers.
–…
View original post 1,673 more words
Neat to see you reblogged Fred’s post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a good post
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed Apolojedi. Going to share your post in the next round up on my blog!
LikeLike
Pingback: Late March 2021 Presuppositional Apologetics’ links | The Domain for Truth