Deductive proof? That sounds pretty strong. There are dozens of arguments for the truth of Christianity. My friends at Theologetics have We already know that revelation from God is irrefutable. And we know that all evidence corroborates what God has revealed, but a deductive proof for Christianity might be seen by some to be beyond the ability of Christians to declare.
First, let’s start with some definitions. What is deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning does not rely on generalizations as opposed to Inductive reasoning, which can only present a probable conclusion based on the particular evidence given. Deductive reasoning gives an argument that provides a conclusion that is certain if the premises are valid and true.
Eli Ayala recently hosted Jon Kaus from Christ Church Twin Cities on his YouTube channel and Jon Kaus briefly explained his work on the deductive proof of Christianity in part 1 and part 2. After watching this video, I searched out Jon Kaus’s videos on his Christ Church Twin Cities website. I was able to find where Kaus presented his arguments in 8 conference sessions with affiliated slideshows. These slideshows are available as links on the respective YouTube videos in the link below
Based on Mr. Kaus’s work, his slideshows, and presentations, here is an organized representation of the axioms, theorems, and conclusion.
Most (if not all) of the work that Kaus has done is based on the work of Cornelius Van Til and Greg Bahnsen. It has been an awesome experience learning what Kaus has been able to put together and I hope you too enjoy this fantastic work
ApoloJedi 
Thanks brother. I look forward to learning more with this great material.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good stuff I’ll share it in the next ROund up
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you brother!
LikeLiked by 1 person
YW
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Early April 2023 Presuppositional Apologetics’ Links | The Domain for Truth
Thank you!
LikeLike
Pingback: Reason or Revelation? | ApoloJedi
Pingback: Contrast Biblical Worldview vs. Evolutionary Worldview | ApoloJedi
Pingback: What Could Persuade You? | ApoloJedi
There are obvious problems with this article. The first is with the notion of evidence. Evidence for a proposition is either a physical object or empirical date that is consistent with the proposition. There are many things in the bible that, even in principle, cannot be verified. These are things like creation in 6 days 6000 years ago, burning bushes without destroying bushes, talking donkeys, and resurrections to name a few.
Then there are things in the bible that are demonstrably wrong. This includes 6 day creation 6000 years ago and the global flood for example. We know that these things are false from science. So it becomes a case of, what is literal and what is metaphorical? Then it becomes that to be a christian, there are things that you have to on blind faith, like the resurrection of Jesus.
LikeLike
Obviously, you are just making wild assertions about evidence. If your worldview could account for the foundations of science/evidence, your objections would carry more weight
LikeLike