Adam and Eve meet in Genetics

Mitochondrial Eve/Y-chromosome Adam. This line of reasoning is complicated, but I’ll do my best to be brief. Mitochondria is a component in the cell that is passed on only from the mother to her daughter. And since mutation rates are measurable (from grandmother to mother to granddaughter), the idea that a mitochondrial eve (the first woman) can be calculated to have existed at a certain point in time. The calculated age of the mitochondrial eve is about 6000 years ago. There are some evolutionary calculations that say the mitochondrial eve is dated to have existed 250,000 years ago. But the calculations are based on the assumption that mankind and chimpanzees evolved from a common ancestor, and the mutation rate comes from that assumption rather than the measurable one (from grandmother to granddaughter). The measurable rate fits the Biblical data very well, but it does not fit the evolutionary assumption at all.

Y chromosome Adam is a similar line of reasoning except that it measures the decay rate of the y chromosome, which is passed on only from a father to his son. When these mutational rates are measured and extrapolated back in time, the date fits perfectly with Noah having lived about 4500 years ago. So, while Y-Chromosome Adam does not refer to the historical Adam, the scientific research makes sense when read from a biblical perspective.


The latest research from the scientists at ICR reveals that evidence from genetics points strongly to a creation about 6000 years ago, just like the Bible claims.

The results of these genetic studies fit perfectly with the predictions of a young-earth creation timeframe but make no sense when millions of years are added to the mix—the clocks simply cannot have been ticking that long.

Yet again, the scientists at ICR show clearly that the Bible’s historical account of the first pair of humans is verified by today’s science.

Third, studies reveal genetic “clocks” that confirm the Bible’s timeline of a recent creation. Every generation, sperm and egg cells incorporate over 100 DNA copying errors. These errors, or mutations, gradually build up. This means you have at least 100 more mutations than your parents, 200 more than your grandparents, 300 more than your great-grandparents, etc. Wind back the mutation clock far enough and we arrive at Adam and Eve, whose DNA was created error-free. At this rate, humanity wouldn’t last for even 1,000 generations.


 Back to the Creation Manifesto Outline


4 thoughts on “Adam and Eve meet in Genetics

  1. Pingback: Creation Manifesto | ApoloJedi

  2. If all female descendants of Biblical Eve died at one point, and all male descendants of Biblical Adam died at another point, you wouldn’t need to trace with either all the way back to Mitchondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam.

    Keep in mind that “People” (Homo Sapiens) were created by God through the evolutionary process in the Genesis chapter 1, verse 27. This occurs prior to the creation of Adam in the immediate by God in Genesis chapter 2, verse 7.

    When Adam an Eve sinned and were forced to leave their special embassy, their children (including Cain and Seth) intermarried the “People” that resided outside the Garden of Eden. This is how Cain was able to find a wife in the Land of Nod in Genesis chapter 4, verses 16-17.


    • Why do you think Gen 1:27 teaches that God used evolutionary processes to create humans? Why do you think there could have been death/suffering/harm/corruption/thorns (which are all required for “evolutionary processes” to bring forth humans – and are all mentioned specifically as curses of sin) PRIOR to the sin of mankind in Gen 3?

      Given the biblical chronologies of Jesus back to Adam/Moses in Chronicles, Matthew, and Luke – why do you think the biblical Adam/Eve died before Genesis 2 & 3?

      Since Gen 3:20 specifically mentions Eve as the “mother of all living (humans)” what biblical text makes you think there could have been other people? Would these other people have been eligible for redemption under the kindred Redeemer (Jesus)? Romans 5


  3. Pingback: Naturalism And Paganism in Modern Media | ApoloJedi

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s