Christians are called to share the gospel. Many evangelists try to throw evidence at people to convince them of the truth of Christianity.
While evidence does point to the truth of Christianity and the revelation of God, people will always interpret evidence according to their worldview. So, the non-believer will take evidence presented and claim it is evidence for THEIR worldview. The non-believer will also incorrectly assume they can justify laws of logic, truth, morality, and induction without the One True God, who revealed Himself in creation, in scripture, and in Jesus.
I really enjoyed reading the article below where I got the following quote:
“Even when/if the classical or evidentialist apologist begins with a Christian worldview, both approaches, even combined end up falling victim to the deserved title of “god of the gaps” arguments. Let’s suppose that a Christian provides a convincing argument for the existence of God, such that the debate opponent surrenders. The question that follows is “which God?” From here we cannot really get to Jesus Christ, because this involves proving the Scriptures according to Christianity are from God, before we could ever get to arguments for the resurrection of Christ.”
Hello faithful readers and guests, here recently I decided to participate in somewhat of a formal debate with another Calvinist on the subject of Apologetics methodology. I confess to being reluctant (for a number of reasons), I turned him down several times, but he persisted to hint and nudge over a period of months, and so I finally gave in.
Here below is my (rather short) opening statement, with a link to more of the (more detailed) debate on christianforums.com below. So far I have completed the first round, and thinking about the direction I might take for the second. Comments, thoughts, etc. are welcome and appreciated.
Brother Mark Kennedy and I have agreed upon a friendly debate on the subject of apologetics, more specifically apologetic methodology. Mark will be making the case for Evidential Apologetics, while I make the case for Presuppositional Apologetics.
The format will be as follows:
View original post 1,150 more words
ApoloJedi 
Glad you’re a Presupper
LikeLiked by 1 person
Everyone is a presupper. Most people don’t realize it and are bad at consistently applying their presuppositions. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep
LikeLike
Thanks to how God has worked through your ministry, I am better at consistently applying my presuppositions to my apologetic. Keep up the great work!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aww God bless you brother! Keep on being the light everywhere!
LikeLiked by 1 person