Because God’s revelation in the Bible is incongruent with modern the academic paradigm of evolution, Christians should reject it. But since it is also a scientific dead-end, even naturalists should reject it.
“Mutations break things, they do not produce new information.”
“As I matured in Christ, I also began to understand the theological implications of deep time. I began to understand that if the earth was millions of years old, then God could not be good and Christ could not be the last Adam, nor could He save us from our sins. The theological implications of the evolutionary deep time were such that I could not accept it. Further, there was good scientific evidence that the rock layers that supposedly needed deep time to form, were formed much more rapidly, as a result of the flood. The Grand Canyon and the geological aftermath of Mount St. Helens stood out to me.”
Happy Question Evolution Day!
Editors Note: Today, February 12 is the birthday of Charles Darwin. Thus it is very appropriate that the Question Evolution Day falls on February 12th.
It’s that time of year again. It’s the time of year the evolutionists go into celebration mode as they honor the birth of their prophet Charles Darwin. International Darwin Day is February twelfth. It is therefore very fitting that the same day be used to question evolution which the priests and temples of Darwinism do their best not to permit. However, thanks to the freedom that the internet provides, dissent can still reach past the ivory towers of academia to the common people. And it is the common people, the ones the ivory tower looks down their noses at, who most strongly reject evolution.
As an outsider to the ivory tower, but someone who has read extensively in the scientific literature, I kind of have…
View original post 761 more words
ApoloJedi 
Good stuff
LikeLiked by 1 person
Darwin is remembered for his MonkeytoMan book but in fact his Worms book proves Earth is young.
LikeLike